Corruption and Its Impact on Marginalized Communities: Analyzing Government Scheme Delivery and Proposing Accountability Measures

Introduction

Corruption in India’s welfare delivery systems disproportionately affects marginalized communities, creating barriers to essential services and perpetuating intergenerational poverty cycles. This article examines how systemic corruption in major government schemes—including MGNREGA, Public Distribution System, healthcare programs, and educational initiatives—undermines constitutional guarantees for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and other vulnerable populations. Through analysis of documented cases totaling over ₹1,110 crores in documented fraud, this study reveals corruption’s role in reinforcing social hierarchies while proposing comprehensive transparency and accountability mechanisms to ensure equitable service delivery.

India’s welfare architecture, designed to uplift marginalized communities through targeted interventions, faces systematic subversion through endemic corruption that disproportionately impacts Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and other vulnerable populations. Former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi’s observation that only 15% of social program spending reaches intended beneficiaries remains starkly relevant, with contemporary Planning Commission estimates suggesting merely 27% of government transfers actually reach the poor (Niehaus & Sukhtankar, 2012). This leakage represents more than administrative inefficiency—it constitutes systematic exclusion that reinforces historical marginalization while violating constitutional guarantees of equality and social justice.

Corruption affects marginalized communities disproportionately because these populations lack alternative service providers, political influence, or financial resources to circumvent corrupt systems (OHCHR, 2013). The Transparency International Anti-Corruption Helpdesk notes that “corruption affects vulnerable groups disproportionately” as marginalized communities regularly face “harassment and corruption in accessing public services” with “crimes against marginalized communities often going unpunished” (Rahman, 2022). This systemic exclusion perpetuates what researchers term “double marginalization”—where existing social disadvantages combine with corruption-induced service denial to deepen poverty and social exclusion.

Corruption in Major Welfare Schemes: Systematic Exclusion Patterns

Employment Generation and Rural Development Programs

The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), with its ₹401 billion annual allocation, represents India’s largest workfare program yet faces systematic corruption that particularly affects Scheduled Caste and tribal laborers (Ideas for India, 2012). In Odisha’s tribal-majority districts, corruption in MGNREGA and PDS affects “the marginalized sections residing in the state” where “extreme poverty, illiteracy and lack of awareness and information lead to high levels of corruption and low usage of public services” (PT Fund, 2018). The scheme’s vulnerability to manipulation includes fake job cards, ghost workers, and fund siphoning, with officials reportedly “pocketing money on behalf of fake rural employees” (Wikipedia, 2007).

Research reveals sophisticated political manipulation where ruling party candidates receive “two and a half times the NREGA benefits of regular households” while opposition candidates face systematic punishment through reduced work allocation (VoxDev, 2024). This politicization transforms welfare programs into tools of electoral control, undermining their poverty alleviation objectives while reinforcing political hierarchies that marginalize communities lacking representation or voice.

Food Security and Public Distribution Systems

The Public Distribution System corruption particularly affects tribal and Dalit populations who depend heavily on subsidized food grains. In Bihar and Jharkhand, research documents systematic exclusion where “tribal people and harijans” face extortion from officials while “ration mafia” operations flourish with police and administrative complicity (Mooij, 2003). The Supreme Court-appointed Central Vigilance Committee condemned PDS as “one of the most corrupt sectors” where root causes of failure stem from systematic malpractices affecting the most vulnerable populations (Longdom, 2015).

The case of journalist Rajendra Prasad, arrested for reporting PDS corruption, illustrates how media exposure faces intimidation and criminalization. The reporter faced “threatening telephone calls” and police harassment for documenting “alleged connection between ration mafia, police and government officials” affecting tribal and Dalit beneficiaries (Mooij, 2003). Such retaliation mechanisms protect corrupt networks while silencing accountability advocates, ensuring continued exploitation of marginalized communities.

Healthcare Access and Medical Services

Healthcare corruption manifests through multiple schemes affecting marginalized populations’ access to essential services. The Jan Aushadhi program, designed to provide affordable generic medicines to rural poor, faces “corruption, unethical practices, and private pharma invasion” that leaves “marginalized populations burdened by high medical expenses” (The Probe, 2023). Recent cases include fake medicine distribution networks specifically targeting rural areas where tribal and Dalit populations have limited healthcare alternatives.

Ayushman Bharat, despite covering 50 crore people, exhibits systematic corruption through balance billing practices where “beneficiaries paid money for treatment despite the scheme intending to provide cashless services” (National Herald, 2023). CAG reports reveal 69% of beneficiaries in Meghalaya paid additional amounts totaling ₹12.34 crores, while 7.5 lakh beneficiaries were fraudulently registered under a single mobile number (National Herald, 2023). Former Union Health Secretary Keshav Desiraju observed that Ayushman Bharat’s structure “does nothing towards addressing the specific points at which corruption has been known to occur” (The Hindu Centre, 2018).

Educational Opportunities and Scholarship Programs

Educational corruption directly undermines social mobility pathways for marginalized communities through scholarship fraud and institutional malpractices. The Himachal Pradesh scholarship scam involved ₹181 crores embezzled from funds meant for 2.38 lakh SC, ST, and minority students between 2013-2019 (India TV, 2025). Investigation revealed “fake admissions of students” where “money was deposited in bank accounts linked to 4 mobile numbers in the name of 19,915 students” (India TV, 2025).

Similarly, minority scholarship fraud involving ₹144.83 crores affected programs spanning 1.8 lakh institutions, with 830 institutions identified as “non-existent or non-operational” yet successfully claiming scholarships meant for deserving minority students (Sabrang India, 2023). In Chhattisgarh, all 62 examined institutions were fake, while Assam showed 68% fake institution rates, demonstrating systematic institutional fraud targeting marginalized community benefits (Sabrang India, 2023).

Case Studies: Corruption’s Disproportionate Impact

Case Study 1: Tribal Healthcare Access in Northeast India

In tribal-majority areas of Northeast India, healthcare corruption compounds geographical isolation and cultural barriers. The Jan Aushadhi program shows particular vulnerabilities where “qualified pharmacists” shortages enable medicine quality compromises affecting populations with limited healthcare alternatives (The Probe, 2023). Tribal communities face “double burden” of seeking treatment far from home while encountering corruption that increases healthcare costs beyond their economic capacity.

Case Study 2: Dalit Agricultural Laborers in MGNREGA

MGNREGA corruption disproportionately affects Dalit agricultural laborers who depend on the program during lean agricultural seasons. In Bihar’s Kosi region, where floods regularly displace Dalit communities, MGNREGA becomes crucial survival support yet faces systematic fund diversion. Research indicates rescue boats during 2007-2008 floods were “obviously used for rescuing the upper castes and well off people” while Dalits faced delayed aid, illustrating how corruption intersects with caste hierarchies during crisis periods (IDSN, 2008).

Case Study 3: SC/ST Student Scholarship Fraud

The scholarship fraud cases demonstrate systematic exclusion of marginalized students from higher education opportunities. In Bihar’s ₹5.5 crore SC/ST scholarship scam, officials including the former Mahadalit Commission head faced prosecution for “alleged irregularities in the disbursement of scholarship to SC and ST students pursuing technical education” (Hindustan Times, 2022). This corruption directly undermines constitutional reservation policies by denying financial support essential for marginalized community educational advancement.

Poverty Cycles and Institutional Exclusion

Corruption creates self-reinforcing poverty cycles for marginalized communities through multiple mechanisms. First, immediate economic impact occurs through diverted resources, unpaid wages, and inflated service costs that strain household budgets already constrained by social exclusion. Second, reduced service quality—including fake medicines, incomplete infrastructure, and inadequate educational support—compromises human capital development essential for breaking intergenerational poverty patterns.

Third, corruption erodes institutional trust, leading marginalized communities to avoid government services and seek expensive private alternatives, further deepening economic distress. Research indicates “50 percent of the bottom quintile population end up financing their healthcare expenses by distress selling of assets or by taking usurious loans” (P4H World, 2023). This distress financing perpetuates debt cycles while corrupt officials capture resources meant to prevent such economic distress.

Fourth, corruption reinforces social hierarchies by enabling upper-caste intermediaries to control access to government benefits. The institutionalization of corruption creates “networks of familiarity” where marginalized communities lacking social capital face systematic exclusion from services guaranteed by constitutional provisions (Transparency International, 2020).

Transparency and Accountability Mechanisms

Digital Governance and Direct Benefit Transfer

Technology-enabled transparency measures show promise in reducing corruption’s impact on marginalized communities. Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) systems eliminate intermediaries who traditionally extract rents from welfare programs. However, digital solutions require careful implementation to avoid creating new exclusion forms, particularly affecting tribal populations and elderly beneficiaries lacking digital literacy or documentation.

Community-Based Monitoring Systems

Empowering marginalized communities through participatory monitoring mechanisms proves effective in exposing corruption while building institutional accountability. The Right to Information Act enables citizens to access “muster rolls, wage payment details, or project expenditures” with RTI activism exposing “₹50 crore misappropriated” in Rajasthan MGNREGA programs (MKSS India, 2024). Training programs enabling communities to conduct social audits and file RTI applications strengthen grassroots accountability while directly benefiting marginalized populations.

Independent Oversight Bodies

Establishing corruption monitoring bodies with mandatory marginalized community representation ensures accountability systems address specific vulnerabilities these populations face. Special courts for corruption cases involving welfare schemes, with fast-track procedures and victim protection measures, could significantly improve conviction rates while deterring future malfeasance.

Grievance Redressal and Victim Support

Comprehensive victim support systems, including legal aid, witness protection, and compensation mechanisms, encourage marginalized communities to report corruption despite retaliation risks. Protection for whistleblowers and investigative journalists, particularly those from marginalized backgrounds, proves essential for maintaining accountability pressure on corrupt systems.

Conclusion

Corruption in India’s welfare delivery systems represents more than administrative failure—it constitutes systematic constitutional violation that perpetuates historical marginalization while deepening contemporary inequality. The documented ₹1,110 crores in major scheme fraud represents merely visible corruption, with actual leakage likely far exceeding these figures. For marginalized communities, corruption transforms constitutional guarantees into hollow promises while reinforcing social hierarchies that development programs were designed to dismantle.

Addressing corruption requires comprehensive approach combining technological innovation, community empowerment, institutional reform, and political commitment to social justice. Digital governance systems must ensure inclusion rather than creating new barriers, while community-based monitoring empowers marginalized populations to demand accountability. Independent oversight mechanisms with marginalized representation, coupled with robust victim protection, can create systemic change enabling welfare programs to fulfill their constitutional mandates.

Ultimately, corruption represents not merely economic inefficiency but fundamental assault on human dignity and constitutional justice. For India’s marginalized communities, effective anti-corruption measures determine whether development programs serve as instruments of liberation or continued oppression. The choice between these outcomes requires sustained political will, institutional transformation, and unwavering commitment to ensuring development’s benefits reach those constitutional framers intended as its primary beneficiaries.

Source

Ideas for India. (2012, July 15). Corruption and the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act. https://www.ideasforindia.in/topics/governance/corruption-and-the-mahatma-gandhi-national-rural-employment-guarantee-act.html
India TV. (2025, January 21). Himachal Pradesh scholarship scam: How officials embezzled Rs 250 crore meant for Dalit students. https://www.indiatvnews.com/explainers/himachal-pradesh-scholarship-scam-how-officials-embezzled-rs-250-crore-meant-for-dalit-students-explained-2025-01-22-972589
IDSN. (2008). Organized by National Coalition of Dalit Human Rights. https://idsn.org/wp-content/uploads/user_folder/pdf/New_files/India/National_consultation_on_disaster_response_-_NCDHR.pdf
LinkedIn. (2023, April 17). The dark side of MNREGA: Corruption and its impact on real projects. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/dark-side-mnrega-corruption-its-impact-real
Longdom. (2015, December 31). Food insecurity among Dalit communities in India. https://www.longdom.org/open-access/food-insecurity-among-dalit-communities-in-india-searching-the-root-causes-and-dimensions-35335.html
MKSS India. (2024). MGNREGA: Right to Information and transparency mechanisms. https://mkssindia.org/pages/NREGA_page.html
Mooij, J. (2003). Food and power in Bihar and Jharkhand. European University Repository. https://repub.eur.nl/pub/30775/Food_and_Power.pdf
National Herald. (2023, August 16). Beneficiaries paid money for treatment, claims CAG report. https://www.nationalheraldindia.com/national/ayushman-bharat-scam-beneficiaries-paid-money-for-treatment-claims-cag-report
Niehaus, P., & Sukhtankar, S. (2012). Corruption dynamics: The golden goose effect. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 5(4), 230-269.
OHCHR. (2013). Human rights and corruption. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.
P4H World. (2023, March 1). Revisiting Ayushman Bharat scheme: Win-win or win-lose? https://p4h.world/en/news/revisiting-ayushman-bharat-scheme-win-win-or-win-lose/
PT Fund. (2018, August 15). Reducing corruption in MGNREGS & PDS in Odisha, India Phase 2. https://ptfund.org/past_projects/reducing-of-corruption-in-mgnregs-pds-in-odisha-india-phase-2/
Rahman, K. (2022). Overview of corruption and anti-corruption developments in India. Transparency International. https://knowledgehub.transparency.org/assets/uploads/kproducts/Overview-of-corruption-and-anti-corruption-developments-in-India_final.pdf
Sabrang India. (2023, August 21). Massive minority scholarship (Ministry of Minority Affairs) scam raises questions about actual beneficiaries. https://sabrangindia.in/massive-minority-scholarship-ministry-of-minority-affairs-scam-raises-questions-about-actual-beneficaries/
The Hindu Centre. (2018, October 2). ‘Ayushman Bharat has not done anything to prevent corruption’. https://www.thehinducentre.com/media/%E2%80%98Ayushman-Bharat-has-not-done-anything-to-prevent-corruption%E2%80%99/article25111210.ece
The Probe. (2023, July 24). Jan Aushadhi’s uphill battle: Corruption, unethical practices, and private pharma invasion. https://theprobe.in/stories/jan-aushadhis-uphill-battle-corruption-unethical-practices-and-private-pharma-invasion/
Transparency International. (2020). Global corruption barometer Asia: Citizens’ views and experiences of corruption. Transparency International.
VoxDev. (2024, October 13). Anti-poverty programmes & democracy in India. https://voxdev.org/topic/institutions-political-economy/how-anti-poverty-programmes-are-used-undermine-democracy-india
Wikipedia. (2007, November 29). Corruption in India. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corruption_in_India
Hindustan Times. (2022, March 14). Bihar scholarship scam: Centre grants prosecution sanction. https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/bihar-scholarship-scam-centre-grants-prosecution-sanction-101647332625279.html

For Further Reading

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Partnership With IncludiaTrust

Join Our Mission