Vocational Education Disparities in Bihar Schools: Reinforcing Class Hierarchies Through Activity-Based Learning

This study examines the profound disparities in vocational education implementation across different school types in Bihar, revealing how activity-based learning inadvertently reinforces existing class hierarchies. While high-fee private schools engage students in sophisticated activities like parliamentary debates and electric vehicle (EV) manufacturing projects, low-fee private and government schools predominantly offer traditional vocational training in carpentry, pottery, and handicrafts. Through comprehensive analysis of educational data from 2020-2025, this research demonstrates that vocational education, intended to democratize skill acquisition, paradoxically perpetuates socioeconomic stratification. The study reveals that only 0.3% of Bihar’s youth aged 15-29 receive formal vocational training compared to the national average of 15%, while persistent caste-based discrimination further marginalizes vulnerable communities. These findings illuminate critical policy gaps that require immediate intervention to ensure equitable access to quality vocational education across all school types in Bihar.

Vocational education in India represents a critical intersection of educational policy, economic development, and social justice. The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 ambitiously targets exposing at least 50% of secondary-level students to vocational education by 2025, recognizing skill-based learning as essential for India’s economic transformation. However, the implementation of this vision reveals stark disparities that mirror and reinforce existing class divisions, particularly evident in Bihar’s educational landscape.

Bihar, with its complex socioeconomic fabric and historical educational challenges, presents a compelling case study for understanding how vocational education can either bridge or widen inequality gaps. The state’s literacy rate of 61.35% in 2011, with significant gender disparities (71.20% for males versus 51.50% for females), provides the backdrop for examining how different school types approach vocational learning. The proliferation of private schools—from high-fee institutions serving urban elites to budget private schools catering to aspirational low-income families—has created a multi-tiered system where vocational activities reflect and reinforce class boundaries.

The significance of this research extends beyond Bihar’s borders, as similar patterns emerge across India’s educational landscape. The declining participation in formal vocational training—from over 10,000 students to merely 500 in Bihar’s +2 examinations—signals systemic failures that demand critical examination. Furthermore, the persistent reliance on private tuition, with 46.7% of government school students and 60.8% of private school students in Bihar seeking additional support, indicates fundamental inadequacies in the formal education system.

This study addresses three critical research questions: How do vocational activities in different school types reflect and reinforce class hierarchies in Bihar? What are the underlying mechanisms that perpetuate educational inequality through activity-based learning? And what policy interventions can ensure equitable access to quality vocational education across all school types? By examining these questions through the lens of Bihar’s educational ecosystem, this research contributes to broader discussions on educational equity, social justice, and the role of vocational training in democratic societies.

Historical Context and Policy Evolution

Colonial Legacy and Post-Independence Challenges

The roots of Bihar’s vocational education disparities trace back to colonial educational policies that prioritized creating a small educated elite while neglecting mass skill development. The British education system in Bihar, established primarily to produce clerks and administrators, created hierarchical structures that persist today. Post-independence policies, while well-intentioned, failed to dismantle these colonial hierarchies, instead inadvertently reinforcing them through differential resource allocation and institutional arrangements.

The introduction of the National Policy on Education (NPE) 1986 marked the first systematic attempt to integrate vocational education into the formal curriculum. However, Bihar’s implementation faced unique challenges including limited infrastructure, inadequate teacher training, and entrenched social biases. The state’s Industrial Training Institutes (ITIs), numbering 152 government and 1,219 private institutions with approximately 121,000 enrolled students, became the primary vehicles for vocational training but remained disconnected from mainstream education.

Contemporary Policy Framework

The National Education Policy 2020 represents a paradigm shift, emphasizing skill-based education from Grade 6 onwards and targeting 50% student exposure to vocational learning by 2025. Bihar’s response has been mixed, with only 44% of schools offering skill-based courses while student enrollment remains at a mere 21%. This implementation gap reflects deeper structural issues that go beyond policy formulation to encompass resource allocation, teacher capacity, and social attitudes toward vocational education.

The state’s Bihar Skill Development Mission (BSDM) has established over 1,000 training centers and claims to have skilled more than 3 million youth. However, these achievements mask significant disparities in quality, accessibility, and outcomes across different socioeconomic groups. The Kushal Yuva Program (KYP), having trained over 2 million young people in communication and digital literacy skills, represents progress but fails to address the fundamental inequities embedded in the school system.

Current Vocational Education Landscape in Bihar

Statistical Overview and Enrollment Patterns

Bihar’s educational infrastructure comprises 1,013,855 government schools and 323,430 private unaided schools, with only 15,454 secondary and higher secondary institutions offering vocational education under the National Skills Qualifications Framework (NSQF). This limited reach means the majority of Bihar’s students lack access to formal vocational training, perpetuating cycles of educational disadvantage.

The decline in vocational education participation is particularly stark. From over 10,000 students appearing for +2 vocational examinations a decade ago, the number plummeted to approximately 500 in recent years. This dramatic reduction reflects systemic failures including lack of competent teachers, inadequate infrastructure, and limited career advancement opportunities. The Bihar School Examination Board attributes this decline to the retirement of specialized instructors without replacement and the reassignment of remaining staff to general education duties.

Institutional Disparities and Resource Allocation

The three-tiered school system in Bihar—government, low-fee private, and high-fee private—creates distinct pathways for vocational learning. Government schools, serving the most economically disadvantaged populations, struggle with basic infrastructure deficits and teacher shortages. The student-teacher ratio averages 42:1 in government schools compared to 21-26:1 in private institutions, severely limiting personalized attention and skill development opportunities.

Low-fee private schools, charging between INR 400-3,500 monthly, occupy a precarious middle ground. While they provide alternatives to dysfunctional government schools, their limited resources constrain vocational offerings to basic trades. These institutions serve aspirational families who sacrifice other necessities to afford education but cannot access high-quality vocational programs.

High-fee private schools, with their superior infrastructure and lower teacher absence rates (10% versus the state average of 39%), offer sophisticated vocational activities that prepare students for modern economic opportunities. These institutions can afford specialized equipment, expert instructors, and industry partnerships that remain inaccessible to their counterparts in the government and low-fee private sectors.

Class-Based Activity Disparities

Elite Institution Activities: Parliamentary Debates and Advanced Manufacturing

High-fee private schools in Bihar increasingly incorporate sophisticated activities like parliamentary debates, Model United Nations simulations, and electric vehicle manufacturing projects. These activities develop critical thinking, public speaking, and technical skills essential for leadership roles in contemporary society. Students engage with complex policy issues, learn democratic processes, and gain exposure to cutting-edge technologies that position them advantageously in competitive examinations and career pursuits.

The parliamentary debate activities, modeled after democratic institutions, teach students to articulate complex arguments, understand policy nuances, and develop confidence in public forums. These skills translate directly into advantages in competitive examinations, leadership positions, and professional careers. Similarly, EV manufacturing projects expose students to renewable energy technologies, engineering principles, and environmental sustainability concepts that align with India’s economic transformation goals.

Traditional Vocational Training in Government and Low-Fee Schools

In stark contrast, government schools and low-fee private institutions predominantly offer traditional vocational training in carpentry, pottery, and handicrafts. While these skills have economic value, they often perpetuate existing class hierarchies by channeling students from disadvantaged backgrounds into manual labor occupations. The National Institute of Open Schooling’s carpentry program, designed for students who have completed 8th grade, exemplifies this trajectory.

Pottery and mud-item making activities, while culturally significant and economically viable, require minimal technological sophistication and capital investment. These activities, though valuable for skill development and potential self-employment, do not provide the same social mobility opportunities as the advanced programs available in elite institutions. The emphasis on traditional crafts, while preserving cultural heritage, inadvertently limits students’ aspirations and career possibilities.

Reinforcement Mechanisms and Social Reproduction

The disparity in vocational activities creates self-reinforcing cycles of advantage and disadvantage. Students in high-fee private schools develop skills and social capital that enable them to access higher education and professional careers, while their counterparts in government and low-fee schools acquire skills that typically lead to informal sector employment or small-scale entrepreneurship. This pattern of social reproduction aligns with Pierre Bourdieu’s concepts of cultural and social capital, where educational institutions perpetuate class distinctions through differentiated curricula and activities.

The psychological impact of these disparities cannot be understated. Students in government schools, already facing stigma and discrimination, encounter further marginalization through limited vocational opportunities. The contrast becomes particularly pronounced when students from different school types interact in competitive examinations or higher education settings, where the advantages gained through sophisticated vocational activities become apparent.

Caste and Social Discrimination in Educational Settings

Documented Cases of Segregation

Recent investigations have uncovered disturbing patterns of caste-based discrimination in Bihar’s government schools, with documented cases of students being segregated along caste and religious lines. The G.A. Higher Secondary School in Vaishali district exemplifies these practices, where separate attendance registers were maintained for students from different social groups, and classroom seating arrangements reflected caste hierarchies.

These discriminatory practices extend beyond administrative segregation to include differential treatment in educational activities. Dalit and tribal children are often assigned menial tasks like cleaning schools and toilets, while being excluded from leadership roles in vocational projects and extracurricular activities. Upper caste students frequently bully and intimidate their marginalized peers, creating hostile learning environments that discourage participation and academic achievement.

Impact on Vocational Education Access

Caste discrimination significantly impacts access to quality vocational education. Students from marginalized communities, already facing social exclusion, encounter additional barriers when attempting to participate in skill development programs. Traditional vocational training in government schools often reinforces occupational stereotypes, with Dalit students being channeled into cleaning, leather work, and other occupations associated with their caste background.

The intersection of caste and class creates particularly complex challenges for vocational education equity. Even when marginalized students access vocational programs, they face discrimination from both peers and instructors that limits their learning opportunities and career prospects. The absence of affirmative action measures in vocational education compounds these challenges, as does the lack of role models and mentors from similar backgrounds.

Systemic Barriers and Institutional Responses

The persistence of caste discrimination in educational settings reflects deeper systemic failures that go beyond individual prejudices to encompass institutional practices and policy gaps. The Bihar government’s inquiry into segregation practices represents a reactive rather than proactive approach to addressing discrimination. Meaningful reform requires comprehensive anti-discrimination policies, teacher training programs, and monitoring mechanisms that ensure inclusive educational environments.

Current efforts to address these challenges remain inadequate. While legal frameworks prohibit caste-based discrimination, enforcement mechanisms are weak, and accountability measures are largely absent. The focus on quantitative indicators like enrollment rates and infrastructure development overlooks qualitative dimensions of educational experience that profoundly impact learning outcomes and social mobility prospects for marginalized students.

Economic Dimensions and Fee Structures

Private School Fee Hierarchies

The fee structure of private schools in Bihar creates distinct market segments that correspond to different vocational education offerings. Budget private schools, serving 25% of their students at fees below INR 200 per month, struggle to provide quality vocational training due to resource constraints. These institutions often lack specialized equipment, qualified instructors, and industry connections necessary for effective skill development programs.

Mid-tier private schools charging INR 400-3,500 monthly occupy an intermediate position, offering basic vocational training that surpasses government school standards but falls short of elite institution quality. These schools face particular challenges in balancing affordability with quality, often compromising on equipment quality, instructor expertise, or program comprehensiveness to maintain competitive pricing.

High-fee private schools, unrestricted by affordability constraints, invest heavily in state-of-the-art facilities, specialized instructors, and industry partnerships that enable sophisticated vocational programs. The Bihar Private Schools Regulation Act, 2019, which caps annual fee increases at 7%, attempts to address cost escalation but does not address the fundamental inequities embedded in the fee structure hierarchy.

Economic Barriers to Quality Vocational Education

The economic dimensions of vocational education access extend beyond school fees to encompass opportunity costs, transportation expenses, and material requirements. Families from economically disadvantaged backgrounds often prioritize immediate income generation over long-term skill development, leading to high dropout rates and limited participation in vocational programs. Child labor remains prevalent, with children contributing to family income rather than attending school or participating in skill development activities.

The cost of vocational education materials and equipment creates additional barriers for disadvantaged students. While government schemes provide some support through scholarships and free materials, coverage remains inadequate and implementation is often marred by bureaucratic delays and corruption. Private institutions can invest in quality equipment and materials, while government schools struggle with outdated tools and insufficient supplies that compromise learning outcomes.

Return on Investment and Career Prospects

The economic returns to different types of vocational education vary significantly, reflecting both the quality of training and market perceptions of credentials. Students from high-fee private schools who complete advanced vocational programs often secure positions in formal sector employment or gain admission to prestigious higher education institutions. Their vocational training certificates carry greater market value due to institutional reputation and network effects.

Conversely, students from government schools and low-fee private institutions who complete traditional vocational programs typically enter informal sector employment or small-scale entrepreneurship with limited growth prospects. While these pathways provide livelihood opportunities, they rarely enable significant upward social mobility or escape from poverty cycles. The absence of effective career counseling and job placement services in government schools further limits students’ ability to maximize returns on their vocational education investments.

Policy Implementation Challenges

NEP 2020 Implementation Gaps

The implementation of NEP 2020’s vocational education provisions in Bihar reveals significant gaps between policy aspirations and ground-level realities. While the policy envisions integrating vocational training from Grade 6 onwards and achieving 50% student exposure by 2025, Bihar’s progress remains limited with only 21% of Grade 9 students enrolled in skill-based courses despite 44% of schools offering such programs.

The state’s response to NEP 2020 has been characterized by uneven adoption, with only one-third of states fully notifying the policy and its associated frameworks. Bihar faces particular challenges in teacher training, curriculum development, and infrastructure upgrading necessary for effective vocational education implementation. The lack of coordination between different government departments further complicates policy execution and resource allocation.

Resource Allocation and Capacity Building

Inadequate financial allocation represents a fundamental constraint on vocational education expansion in Bihar. Despite the state’s Bihar Skill Development Mission establishing over 1,000 training centers, resource limitations prevent comprehensive coverage and quality improvement. The absence of adequate funding for equipment procurement, instructor training, and program development perpetuates existing disparities between different school types.

Capacity building challenges extend beyond financial resources to encompass human capital development. The shortage of qualified vocational instructors, particularly in emerging technology areas, limits program quality and student outcomes. Most existing instructors lack contemporary industry experience and pedagogical training necessary for effective vocational education delivery. The retirement of experienced instructors without adequate replacement further exacerbates capacity constraints.

Coordination and Governance Issues

The implementation of vocational education in Bihar suffers from fragmented governance structures and poor coordination between different agencies. Multiple departments including Education, Skill Development, Labor, and Industry share responsibilities for vocational training, leading to duplication, gaps, and conflicting priorities. The absence of integrated planning and monitoring mechanisms prevents effective resource utilization and outcome assessment.

Bureaucratic hurdles and centralized decision-making processes further impede effective implementation. Curriculum revision and program approval processes remain highly centralized and slow, preventing responsive adaptation to changing industry needs and local employment opportunities. Faculty input in decision-making processes is limited, reducing the practical relevance and effectiveness of vocational programs.

Comparative Analysis with Other Indian States

Success Models and Best Practices

Several Indian states have achieved greater success in vocational education implementation, offering valuable lessons for Bihar. Gujarat leads with 57% of secondary schools offering vocational courses and 34% student enrollment, demonstrating the importance of political commitment and systematic planning. The state’s strong industry base and proactive government policies have created an enabling environment for vocational education expansion.

Kerala’s success in elementary education provides insights into the importance of political will, community participation, and sustained investment. The state’s historical commitment to education, dating back to the 1817 royal rescript proclaiming education as state responsibility, has created institutional foundations that support comprehensive educational development including vocational training.

Uttar Pradesh’s Graded Learning Program offers specific pedagogical innovations that Bihar could adapt. The program’s differentiated teaching approach, which groups children according to their current abilities rather than age, demonstrates effective strategies for addressing learning gaps and improving educational outcomes. Similar approaches could enhance vocational education effectiveness in Bihar’s diverse student population.

Adapting Successful Strategies

The adaptation of successful strategies from other states requires careful consideration of Bihar’s unique context and constraints. Gujarat’s industry-education partnerships may be challenging to replicate given Bihar’s limited industrial base, but the state could focus on agriculture-based vocational programs and service sector skills that align with its economic structure.

Kerala’s emphasis on teacher training and community participation offers more readily adaptable lessons. Bihar could strengthen its teacher preparation programs, particularly for vocational instructors, and increase community involvement in school governance and monitoring. The state’s existing Panchayati Raj institutions could play larger roles in vocational education planning and implementation.

Regional Variations and Local Adaptations

Bihar’s diverse geography and economic conditions require region-specific approaches to vocational education. Northern districts with better industrial development could focus on manufacturing and technology-related skills, while southern regions might emphasize agriculture, livestock, and traditional crafts. Coastal areas could develop fishing and aquaculture programs, while border regions might focus on trade and logistics skills.

The state’s significant migration patterns also suggest the need for portable and recognized vocational credentials that enable workers to utilize their skills across different regions. Coordination with destination states for Bihar’s migrant workers could create pathways for skill recognition and career advancement that benefit both individual workers and the broader economy.

Social Justice and Human Rights Implications

Right to Education and Equality

The disparities in vocational education across different school types in Bihar raise fundamental questions about the right to education and equality of opportunity. The Indian Constitution’s Article 21A guarantees free and compulsory education, while the Right to Education Act 2009 mandates equitable access to quality education. However, the stark differences in vocational opportunities between elite private schools and government institutions suggest systematic violations of these constitutional principles.

The concept of substantive equality requires not just formal access to education but meaningful opportunities for all students to develop their potential and achieve social mobility. When high-fee private schools offer parliamentary debates and EV manufacturing while government schools provide only basic carpentry and pottery training, the state fails to ensure genuine equality of educational opportunity. This disparity perpetuates intergenerational poverty and social stratification in violation of constitutional equality principles.

Implications for Social Mobility

Vocational education serves as a critical pathway for social mobility, particularly for students from disadvantaged backgrounds who may not excel in traditional academic subjects. However, the current system in Bihar often reinforces existing hierarchies by channeling students from different socioeconomic backgrounds into predetermined occupational paths. This outcome contradicts the democratic promise of education as a great equalizer and instead makes schools instruments of social reproduction.

The human rights implications extend beyond individual students to encompass broader social cohesion and democratic governance. When educational institutions systematically prepare students from different backgrounds for different roles in society, they undermine social solidarity and democratic citizenship. The parliamentary debates available to elite students develop civic engagement and leadership skills, while traditional craft training for disadvantaged students prepares them primarily for subordinate economic roles.

Policy Recommendations for Equity

Addressing these social justice concerns requires comprehensive policy reforms that go beyond incremental improvements to encompass structural changes in vocational education delivery. First, the state must ensure that all schools, regardless of their fee structure or management type, provide access to diverse vocational opportunities including both traditional skills and emerging technologies.

Second, affirmative action measures should be implemented to ensure that students from marginalized communities receive additional support to access and succeed in high-quality vocational programs. This could include reserved seats in prestigious vocational courses, scholarships for equipment and materials, and mentorship programs connecting disadvantaged students with successful professionals.

Third, the state should establish quality standards and monitoring mechanisms that ensure all vocational programs meet minimum criteria for instructor qualifications, equipment standards, and learning outcomes. Regular inspections and public reporting could create accountability mechanisms that prevent the perpetuation of substandard programs in schools serving disadvantaged populations.

Recommendations and Policy Interventions

Immediate Short-term Measures

Bihar’s government should implement immediate measures to address the most pressing disparities in vocational education. First, establish mobile vocational education units that can provide advanced training opportunities to government and low-fee private schools lacking infrastructure. These units could offer periodic intensive workshops in parliamentary debate skills, basic electronics and EV technology, computer programming, and other high-value skills currently available only in elite institutions.

Second, create teacher exchange programs that enable skilled instructors from high-fee private schools to spend time in government institutions, while government school teachers receive training in advanced pedagogical methods. This cross-pollination could help standardize instruction quality across different school types while building professional networks that benefit all students.

Third, implement technology-based solutions including online vocational training platforms, virtual reality workshops, and digital simulation tools that can provide high-quality learning experiences regardless of physical infrastructure limitations. The existing Digital India initiatives could be leveraged to ensure all students have access to advanced vocational learning opportunities through technology-mediated instruction.

Medium-term Structural Reforms

The state should undertake comprehensive structural reforms to address systemic inequities in vocational education. First, establish regional vocational education centers that serve clusters of schools regardless of their management type. These centers could house expensive equipment, specialized laboratories, and expert instructors that individual schools cannot afford, ensuring all students have access to high-quality facilities.

Second, create industry partnership programs that connect all schools with local employers, professional associations, and technical experts. These partnerships should be mandated rather than voluntary, ensuring that government and low-fee private schools receive the same level of industry exposure as their elite counterparts. Formal agreements could specify minimum levels of guest lectures, internship opportunities, and career guidance for all participating schools.

Third, implement comprehensive teacher preparation and professional development programs specifically focused on vocational education. This should include mandatory training in contemporary industry practices, pedagogical innovations, and anti-discrimination practices. Regular certification requirements could ensure that all vocational instructors maintain current knowledge and inclusive teaching practices.

Long-term Systemic Changes

Long-term reforms should address the fundamental structures that perpetuate educational inequality in Bihar. First, consider implementing a unified school system that eliminates the artificial distinctions between government, aided, and private schools. All schools could receive public funding based on enrollment and performance metrics, while maintaining autonomy in curriculum delivery and institutional management.

Second, establish a comprehensive vocational education curriculum that ensures all students, regardless of school type, have access to both traditional skills and emerging technologies. The curriculum should emphasize transferable skills like critical thinking, communication, and problem-solving while providing practical training in specific trades and professions.

Third, create systematic pathways between vocational education and higher education that prevent the current dead-end nature of many vocational programs. Students completing vocational training should have clear routes to diploma, degree, and professional programs that enable continued learning and career advancement.

Conclusion

This comprehensive analysis of vocational education disparities in Bihar reveals a troubling reality where activity-based learning, intended to democratize skill acquisition and promote social mobility, instead reinforces existing class hierarchies and perpetuates educational inequality. The stark contrast between sophisticated programs like parliamentary debates and EV manufacturing in high-fee private schools and basic carpentry and pottery training in government institutions represents more than mere resource differences—it reflects systematic discrimination that violates constitutional principles of equality and social justice.

The research demonstrates that Bihar’s vocational education system operates as a mechanism of social reproduction rather than transformation. Students from privileged backgrounds gain access to activities that develop leadership skills, technological literacy, and social capital necessary for professional success, while their disadvantaged counterparts receive training that typically leads to informal sector employment or small-scale entrepreneurship. This bifurcated system, compounded by persistent caste discrimination and economic barriers, creates self-reinforcing cycles that limit social mobility and democratic participation.

The policy implications of these findings demand urgent attention from educational administrators, policymakers, and civil society organizations. The National Education Policy 2020’s ambitious vision of inclusive, skill-based education cannot be realized without addressing the fundamental inequities embedded in the current system. Bihar’s experience serves as a cautionary tale for other states implementing vocational education reforms, highlighting the need for explicit equity measures and systematic monitoring to prevent unintended discriminatory outcomes.

The path forward requires comprehensive reforms that go beyond incremental improvements to encompass structural changes in resource allocation, teacher preparation, curriculum development, and institutional governance. The establishment of regional vocational centers, mandatory industry partnerships for all schools, and unified quality standards represents a starting point for creating genuinely equitable access to quality vocational education.

Ultimately, the goal of vocational education should be to expand rather than constrain students’ life chances, providing all young people with the skills, knowledge, and confidence necessary to participate fully in democratic society and economic development. Bihar’s current system falls far short of this ideal, but the research also reveals opportunities for transformation through sustained political commitment, adequate resource allocation, and community engagement.

The state’s response to these challenges will significantly impact the futures of millions of young people and the broader trajectory of social development in Bihar. As India positions itself as a global knowledge economy, ensuring equitable access to quality vocational education becomes not just a matter of social justice but economic necessity. The time for incremental reform has passed; Bihar needs transformative change that places equity and inclusion at the center of vocational education policy and practice.

References

Kumar, R. (2017). Skill development issues, challenges and strategies in Bihar the vocational education. International Journal of Advanced Education and Research, 2(1), 66-70.

The India Forum. (2024, February 18). Bihar turns its back on school education. Retrieved from https://www.theindiaforum.in/forum/bihar-turns-its-back-school-education

Bashir, S. (2018). National Sample Survey data analysis for Bihar education indicators. World Bank Economic Analysis Unit.

Status of vocational education in Bihar. (2024). International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, 12(10), 561-562.

India Institute. (2013). The private school revolution in Bihar: Findings from a survey in Patna Urban. Newcastle University.

Bihar Connect. (2021). Online schooling can help reduce inequalities in educational outcomes. Retrieved from https://biharconnect.in/education/online-schooling-can-help-reduce-inequalities

Times of India. (2021, January 6). Vocational education in schools comes a cropper. Patna News.

Deccan Herald. (2012, January 21). A key Bihar lesson – don’t forget the private tuition!

Times of India. (2025, July 11). India’s skill education divide: Which states are leading in school-based vocational learning.

Education for All in India. (2025, August 10). Status of school education in Bihar: An analysis of UDISE+ data.

Pushkar Raj. (2024, July 24). Revitalizing Bihar’s education system: Lessons from ‘Work in Progress’. LinkedIn.

IDR Online. (2021, September 27). Let us not give up on government schools.

Kozel, V., & Parker, B. (2007). Education and inequality in Bihar: Analysis of living conditions survey data. IDE-ADRI.

Centre for Civil Society. (2022). Reach and role of private schools in India. Policy Research Report.

Business Standard. (2018, December 19). Caste, religion segregation in Bihar govt school, inquiry ordered.

Education for All in India. (2025, August 3). Review of NEP 2020 to 2025 with focus on vocalisation of education.

The Logical Indian. (2018, December 20). Bihar: Students of govt school allegedly made to sit in separate sections based on caste.

NDTV. (2018, December 17). Bihar school allegedly segregates students on caste, religion.

MVF Bihar. (2019). Changing social norms on education and child labour through processes of social mobilisation in Bihar.

The Academic. (2025, June). Job satisfaction of teacher educators in Bihar in the context of NEP 2020 implementation.

Times of India. (2019, February 12). Government caps private school fee hike at 7%. Patna News.

Supreme Court Case Monitor. (2024, February 2). Patna HC rejects petition challenging validity of provisions of Bihar Private Schools Fee Regulation Act.

Centre for Civil Society. (2017). Low-fee private schools in India: The emerging fault lines. NCSPE Working Paper 233.

PSSCIVE. (2022). Kaushal Bodh vocational education activity book for Grade 6.

Central Square Foundation. (2022). State of the sector report: Private schools in India.

Patna High Court. (2024, February 2). School fees: Patna High Court validates regulation on private school fees.

Centre for Civil Society. (2017). Budget private schools in India: Market dynamics and regulatory challenges.

Kumar, P., & Shadab, N. (2024). Impact of skill training programs in Bihar: A pathway to economic empowerment. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, 11(11), c515-c516.

Mehta, A. (2025). UDISE+ 2022-23 & 2023-24 analysis. Education for All in India.

Education for All in India. (2025, March 1). Trends in UDISEPlus key indicators data from 2020-21 to 2023-24.

Government of Bihar. (2025). Bihar Economic Survey 2024-25. Finance Department.

Education for All in India. (2025). School education in India: Where do we stand 2023-24.

PARAKH. (2025). State report Bihar. National Council of Educational Research and Training.

UNESCO. (2021). Technical and vocational education training (TVET) in India: Status and challenges.

Law Chakra. (2024, February 2). School fees: Patna High Court validates regulation on private school fees.